Today I watched as Mitt Romney closed his presidential campaign. I can't fault his reasons, but I sure wish he'd not done it. I believe he was the only one we had to choose from that stood for the right things. President Hinkley told us to "stand for something". While this is true, I would add, "but make sure that what you stand for is based on true principals". How do you make sure that the things you stand for are based on the proper principals? The answer is simple. Are they based upon the principals of the gospel that we know are true and in accord with what the Lord has taught through His own words and that of His prophets?
When I was getting my medical exam and my shots so that I could go to Sweden on my mission, I was in the offices of our family doctor and while I was sitting there for a few seconds with little to do, I noticed a small leaflet on the table that was talking about socialized medicine and how we needed to fight the government and the liberals to keep from having them pass any laws that would move us any closer to having any of this kind of program in our country. At the time, I knew nothing at all about any of this and so when the doctor, a man whom I knew to be easy going and very bright, got to the point where I could talk to him a little, I asked what socialized medicine was and why it was so bad. His answer at first confused me, because he stated that it was government financing to pay for medical procedures and that it was not a good thing. I asked why he would object to letting the government or anyone else help pay for the medical bills that a person might have trouble paying. He told me that this had been tried before in countries like England, France, Germany and Holland and that everywhere that it had been tried, it had not only failed, but that it had put that country trying it into financial ruin. Also, he said, once you started down that path, it was almost impossible to turn back. He also said that the other programs that were based on "federal aid to" (education, families, etc.) were just as bad. This was back in the early 60's and I was in my late teens and not at all wise in anything to speak of. I said I still didn't see why this would be so. He was getting very frustrated at my ignorance and I had never seen him so passionate about anything before. He then gave me a quick but very insightful lesson on both government and economics. Who, he asked, is the government? That is, who is it that pays these bills for all of these things and where do they get the money to pay for it all? It all comes from us and from taxes that are levied against all of us in order to pay for the monetary obligations that we permit our elected officials to encumber us with. Furthermore, whenever the government gets involved in something of this nature that should be handled by the private sector, it takes at least one and most times several extra layers of government officials to oversee the programs and these people have to be paid and their offices supplies and so forth need to be financed with still more money that it then needs to get from us to pay for. Furthermore, government officials, once set in place are almost impossible to control or to get rid of (ie. to fire them) if they don't do the job the way you think it should be done. In short, it takes more money to do the job, and more paperwork to do the job, and more time to do the job and the job is not done nearly so well as if the people who have been doing it since the country first started to be a country were left to continue to do the job as they have been doing.
I still was not sure if he was right or not, but at least he had made me aware of some new concepts that I had never given any thought to before. I went ahead and continued my preparations for my mission and soon found myself in Sweden. I fell in love with the place. It was fabulous. I loved the work. I loved the people. I loved almost everything about it. One thing I did find out about Sweden, However, was that it is socialistic all the way. They have this dreaded "socialized medicine". They have social aid to education and in the workplace and family and business and media and everything else you can think of. They are held up to the world as the showcase of socialism and to show that socialism really does work. The only problem is that it doesn't work. At least not to any degree that I would want to live under for any length of time. I saw people suffer and some die because of their socialized medicine. I saw businessmen who were being strangled by the government oversight that they had to put up with, such as having to hire someone to help them and then not being able to fire that person when the job was done, and not only that, but having to continue to pay that person for work that he literally never even showed up to work to do because "he didn't really feel up to it today". I saw students that after graduating from their equivalent of high school, didn't have a ninth grade education. I saw families get "barnbidrag" which is pay to the families for each child that they had. Many families earned their living just by having enough kids (five or six usually did it) that nobody in the family had to work, but were totally supported by the government (again, who pays for all this?). I saw socialism in all of it's forms and one thing that I noticed that to me was even greater than the fact that the average Swede paid well over 80% of his income in taxes to support this government intrusion into all facets of their life (at that time, we were paying about 20% or so), was the fact that because the government did so much "for them", it took away their control of their own lives to the point that they actually got out of the habit of making their own decisions about things. I know that this sounds a little funny, but to witness it is no laughing matter. They actually get to the point where they have trouble making the simplest of decisions. They need someone else to make the decision for them and then ask them, "is that o.k. with you"? I heard stories when I was growing up about the slaves in the south after the civil war was over. Most of them didn't know what to do or where to go and so they many times just continued on working for the families that they had always worked for and in the same conditions or worse. They had lost the ability to make the simple little decisions to run their own lives. Prisoners in our penal systems become "institutionalized" in the same manner, as do many prisoners of war. Citizens of Russia and other dictatorial countries, upon getting their freedom, often are in the same condition. Why? I believe that our ability to make decisions is like any other thing in our life. The more we do it the easier it gets to do. Maybe this is why the Lord rejected Satan's plan. It was based on taking away our ability to decide for ourselves what we should do. It took away our ability to prove ourselves to ourselves or to God, what manner of men we would be. It is a major pillar in the very concept of freedom and of the gospel. I dread socialism because I have seen what it can and does do to a person and to a nation. Yes, I have seen it. I have been there and done it and lived under it and I want no part of it. I found out what my good old family doctor was trying to tell me.
I had the opportunity to interview a married couple who were both doctors in their socialized medical system. I mentioned to them that I had a companion who had been having some trouble with his health. At last we went to a hospital to get it checked out. We literally waited in the waiting room all day long for two full days to be helped, and still hadn't gotten any. Finally, on the third day, after it became apparent that we were in for more of the same, my companion butted in line and said to the receptionist (in English, this time) " Pardon me, but what does it take to get waited on around here?" She looked at him like he had just pulled a gun on her, and said something to the effect of "are you an American? What are you doing here? This is a public hospital. Just a moment, please." She then jumped up and went into the back area and was immediately followed out by a doctor who ushered us into a private room. He there told us again and again how sorry he was that we had been treated so badly and that it had taken so long to see him. He told us that we should have let it be known right from the start that we were Americans and that we were not there at the expense of the Swedish government. He said that then we would have been taken care of properly because he knew that we would be paying our bill ourselves. The couple that I was interviewing, laughed at this and said that the other doctor was right. That this was not an exception, but rather, the rule. I asked why and they told me that they only got paid a set amount for each patient and it made no difference what was wrong with them, or how long it took. Also, the average person was so used to any and all medical attention being "free" to them, they would go to the hospital for every little thing that they thought may be going on no matter how trivial. As a result, the system was flooded with hypocondriacs and if anything at all, all they needed was an aspirin or a band aid. Also, they mentioned that because of this it was bankrupting the country and they never had enough money to get the right equipment that they needed to really take care of the people that did actually need their help. All of this together made it very tough to actually be a good caring doctor all of the time and after a few years the average doctor became burned out and for the most part, gave up. I asked when they had switched over to this system and was told that it had not happened all at once, but in little bits and pieces. First came medical help for the aged. Then for the kids. Next for the very poor and then for industrial mishaps, and so forth. It was hard, they said to turn down any of the small additions to the package and that they really weren't sure when they had gone too far.
when I was there, I heard and saw ads telling the people not to support the "pirates" in any way. I asked what was meant by that and was told that Sweden had one t.v. station and three radio stations that were all government controlled. The entire content of what the people were allowed to see and hear was dictated by the State. The whole thing, of course, was also financed by the government. The trouble with that was that there were some capitalistic "pirates" that would broadcast from just outside of the "three mile limit" from stations set up on ships, and that played more of what the people wanted to see and hear on their radio and t.v. stations, and then financed their stations with advertisements from businesses operating within the area that could receive their signals. This really bothered the government because they had absolutely no control over what was broadcast and they couldn't tax it either. These stations were by far the most popular ones and all the government could do to try to limit them, was to appeal to the publics sense of patriotism to try to limit the pirates' success.
When you look at what we were like back then, and what we are today, it makes me shudder. Having been told what to look out for and then watching it creeping up and over us year by year since I came back, has been a very frustrating and discouraging thing. I don't know how to stop or even slow down what is happening to our once great nation. And when we finally get a good man running for office, that may be able to see what's coming and may know how to hinder it's enveloping pervasiveness, the people that need to vote him into office get sidetracked with minutia and don't see the real issues and the seriousness of the whole situation. Not just in the medical field, but as I mentioned, in all fields. Our founding fathers did not intend for the government to solve all of our problems for us. They never wanted it to run our lives and control us to the extent that it does today. They were very wary of the government having too much control over us and many of them said so many times and in no uncertain terms. Where did we start to lose it, then? Little by little, just like the Swedes. It's the parable of the frog being boiled in the water, again. He doesn't realize that he's in trouble because of how gradually the heat is being applied, until it's too late. I only hope that it's not already too late. Yes, stand for something. Champion something. Fight for something, but make sure that what you stand for, champion and fight for is based on correct principals. Then, don't give up even though the odds look to be stacked against you. We have been told that those who the Lord has standing with us are far more and greater than those who oppose us, even if we cannot see them. Discouraging? Yes, but I'd rather lose fighting for the right side than win fighting for the wrong side. I believe that our votes cast for and against causes and candidates, are tallied not just here on earth. I know that we must answer for our actions and inactions. We must do our best to get the right people to represent us and the right issues on or off of the ballots, but after we do what we can, no matter how bleak the outcome, we must still vote for the best choices that we are able to.
Sooner,
Badger Bill